In a candid interview, former India cricketer Manoj Tiwary shared his thoughts on India’s recent struggles in the Border-Gavaskar Trophy and raised questions about Gautam Gambhir’s authority as head coach. He also expressed disappointment over Rohit Sharma’s decision to opt out of the decisive Sydney Test, stating that as captain, Rohit should have led from the front despite his poor form.
Rohit Sharma’s Self-Exclusion Sparks Debate
India’s 1-3 defeat in the Border-Gavaskar Trophy against Australia has been a talking point, particularly the absence of captain Rohit Sharma in the all-important Sydney Test. Rohit, who managed only 31 runs in the first three Tests, chose to step down from the playing XI, citing his poor form.
Tiwary criticized this decision, suggesting that Rohit doubted his own abilities. “Rohit Sharma should have played in Sydney as the captain. A leader should never drop himself when the series is on the line,” Tiwary said.
He emphasized that a captain’s rough patch is not unusual and can be overcome with determination. “Rohit is a proven talent. Batters, bowlers, and even coaches go through tough phases. He should have shown confidence in his abilities and led the team in such a crucial match,” he added.
Questioning Gambhir’s Authority
Tiwary also expressed skepticism about Gambhir’s ability to make tough calls regarding senior players like Rohit Sharma and Virat Kohli. “I believe the decision to step down was entirely Rohit’s. I don’t think Gautam Gambhir would have dropped either Rohit or Kohli,” Tiwary stated.
This statement sheds light on potential challenges in managing senior players and raises questions about Gambhir’s authority as head coach.
Jalaj Saxena’s Omission from the Squad
Tiwary also criticized the selection process for the Border-Gavaskar Trophy, particularly the inclusion of Tanush Kotian over Jalaj Saxena. The latter, a seasoned first-class cricketer with 464 wickets and 6,834 runs to his name, was overlooked despite his consistent performances.
“Jalaj Saxena has been a phenomenal performer in domestic cricket. He deserved the opportunity, especially after Ravichandran Ashwin’s retirement. It’s disappointing to see such talent being ignored,” Tiwary said.
He added that Kotian’s selection highlights how deserving players without influential backing often get sidelined. “Sometimes, players without a strong voice or support system are neglected. Jalaj’s exclusion is an example of this,” he remarked.
Concerns Over India’s ICC Performances
Tiwary further expressed concerns over India’s inability to consistently win ICC tournaments, questioning the mindset of being satisfied with sporadic victories. “India has all the facilities, resources, and security for players, yet the performances in ICC tournaments have been underwhelming,” he said.
He urged the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) to address these issues to replicate Australia’s dominance in global tournaments. “We need to aim higher and believe that winning every ICC tournament is possible. If certain issues are addressed, I’m confident India can achieve that,” he concluded.
The Road Ahead
Tiwary’s remarks bring to light critical aspects of leadership, selection, and accountability in Indian cricket. As the team works to rebuild after recent setbacks, these observations may serve as a wake-up call for both players and management to focus on consistent performances and strategic decisions.
